Comments on: Canada’s Village Idiot Speaks…

By: johnnyonline

johnnyonline — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 01:46:16 +0000

following the logic (for lack of a better word) – in the future it would be better (according to mr cherniak) to surrender when threatened. imagine that – bullies and their targets could all live in harmony. who needs law and order or private property when all that’s needed is to acquiesce.

do i get to choose a yolk in my favourite colour?

By: James Goneaux

James Goneaux — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 13:59:26 +0000

Looks like Jason is going for another “Liberal Hunting Dog of Excellence award again:

http://thejagwire.blogspot.com/2008/03/liberal-hunting-dog-of-excellence-award.html

By: cousinarlo

cousinarlo — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 02:24:28 +0000

The very fact that we are talking about this (law) is what makes the continued existence of the law so important. — Jason Cherniak

In other words, “I stink, therefore I am”

By: Chris

Chris — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:25:45 +0000

“I believe that you should not be allowed to attack people in writing on the basis of their religion. If you believe you have made an intelligent argument based on the truth, then prove it by allowing those who disagree to have their say.”

How can Mr. Cherniak not understand the inherent conflict in these two sentences. If you should not be “allowed” to attack people in writing on the basis of their religion, then how can we have anyone who disagrees with a message that was not allowed in the first place?

The second paragraph is even worse. He seems to be saying that the effect of censorship by human rights commissions will be to increase public discourse on controversial topics? This is profound idiocy.

By: WL Mackenzie Redux

WL Mackenzie Redux — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:56:45 +0000

Cherniak is the perennial confused goof that is attracted to the constantly changing morass of ideologies esposed by the LPC..are we surprised he so confused he doesn’t realize he’s :

a) advocation the abolition of the righ to dissent to any orthodoxy (political/idological/theological) and confusing the exercise of theat right with religious intolerance?
b) That as far as religious intolerance goes He and the party/political ideology he subscribes to have been very busy in repressing religious freedom with things like making churches remove nativity scenes, no crosses in schools, no preyers either…and on and on with the militant secular hypocrisy of the Liberal-left…they are the LAST people who should defend religious freedom.

By: Radio Free Canada » CHRC Launches Major Propaganda Offensive

Radio Free Canada » CHRC Launches Major Propaganda Offensive — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 05:42:18 +0000

[...] “Hang’em High” Lynch and Jason Cherniak must be the only two people, apart from Lucy Warman, left in Canada that actually believe [...]